Join Books.org — it's free

General & Miscellaneous Law, True Crime
A House Divided by Paul R. Abramson — book cover

A House Divided

by Paul R. Abramson, Steven D. Pinkerton
Available on Bookshop Write a review

Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.

Log in to track your reading progress.

Overview

Based on a true story, A House Divided: Suspicions of Mother-Daughter Incest tells the emotionally harrowing tale of a mother’s fight to retain custody of her daughter amid horrifying accusations of mother-daughter incest.

Searching for the truth behind these accusations, while reconstructing this troubling tale from case interviews, trial transcripts, police reports, and other documentary sources, the authors find in this unusual case an ideal springboard for a serious consideration of the legal and psychological issues underlying the assessment and prosecution of incest cases, in particular of mother-daughter incest.

A House Divided serves as a vivid reminder of the legal, moral, and social complexities surrounding cases involving sex crimes.

Synopsis

Based on a true story, A House Divided: Suspicions of Mother-Daughter Incest tells the emotionally harrowing tale of a mother’s fight to retain custody of her daughter amid horrifying accusations of mother-daughter incest.

Publishers Weekly

Sex experts and coauthors (With Pleasure; Sexual Nature/Sexual Culture) Abramson (UCLA) and Pinkerton (Medical College of Wisconsin) present a riveting true story about a mother accused of sexually molesting her five-year-old daughter. What intrigues Abramson is that, if the incest did occur, the case presents the opportunity to study the pathology of the extremely rare phenomenon of mother-daughter incest; if no incest occurred, then by testifying on behalf of the mother he could prevent a miscarriage of justice. Abramson's narration of how, using both candid interviews and standard psychological tests, he determines that the mother was wrongly accused is meticulous and engaging, as are his descriptions of the other major players--a concerned teacher, two driven child welfare counselors and the singleminded doctors who testify on behalf of the prosecution. As the drama unfolds in court, the reader quickly learns just how personal and political agendas can overshadow truth and justice. Abramson informs his account with dispassionate psychological expertise, pointing out critical inconsistencies every step of the way. In the epilogue, he and Pinkerton offer a utilitarian procedure for diagnosing, with greater accuracy, instances of mother-daughter incest. Their argument appears crisp and concise, but the discussion is rather narrow and technical for the lay reader, who might benefit more from a broader discussion of the phenomenon of mother-daughter incest and what is being done to prevent it. (Sept.) Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.|

About the Author, Paul R. Abramson

Dr. Paul R. Abramson (UCLA) is one of the leading sexual theorists in the country and also one of the most sought-after legal "sex" experts. He has consulted on many high-profile cases touching on topics like "dial-a-porn," video obscenity, sexual harrassment, and the infamous "Club Fuck" case. He is former editor of the Journal of Sex Research and author of six other books. He also has appeared several times on the nationally syndicated PBS show Closer to the Truth.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Log in to write one.

Editorials

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly

Sex experts and coauthors (With Pleasure; Sexual Nature/Sexual Culture) Abramson (UCLA) and Pinkerton (Medical College of Wisconsin) present a riveting true story about a mother accused of sexually molesting her five-year-old daughter. What intrigues Abramson is that, if the incest did occur, the case presents the opportunity to study the pathology of the extremely rare phenomenon of mother-daughter incest; if no incest occurred, then by testifying on behalf of the mother he could prevent a miscarriage of justice. Abramson's narration of how, using both candid interviews and standard psychological tests, he determines that the mother was wrongly accused is meticulous and engaging, as are his descriptions of the other major players--a concerned teacher, two driven child welfare counselors and the singleminded doctors who testify on behalf of the prosecution. As the drama unfolds in court, the reader quickly learns just how personal and political agendas can overshadow truth and justice. Abramson informs his account with dispassionate psychological expertise, pointing out critical inconsistencies every step of the way. In the epilogue, he and Pinkerton offer a utilitarian procedure for diagnosing, with greater accuracy, instances of mother-daughter incest. Their argument appears crisp and concise, but the discussion is rather narrow and technical for the lay reader, who might benefit more from a broader discussion of the phenomenon of mother-daughter incest and what is being done to prevent it. (Sept.) Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.|

Booknews

Tells the tale of a mother's fight to retain custody of her daughter amid accusations of mother-daughter incest, drawing on case interviews, trial transcripts, police reports, and other documentary sources. The case is used as a springboard for consideration of the legal and psychological issues underlying the assessment and prosecution of incest cases, in particular mother-daughter incest. Abramson is former editor of the . Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

Book Details

Published
September 1, 2000
Publisher
Norton, W. W. & Company, Inc.
Pages
240
Format
Paperback
ISBN
9780393976359

More by Paul R. Abramson

Similar books