Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Synopsis
Robert Roth, among the first few Catholics to write favorably, even if critically, about American pragmatism, presents here a creative piece of comparative philosophy in which he achieves a long-term goal of attempting a reconciliation between pragmatism and a classical spiritual and religious perspective. The title, Radical Pragmatism, is an adaptation of William James's "radical empiricism." James had argues that the classical empiricists, Locke and Hume, did not go far enough in their account of experience. They missed some of its most important aspects, namely connections and relations, and as a result they were left with discrete sense data and sense objects.
Booknews
Roth (philosophy, emeritus, Fordham U.) presents a creative work of comparative philosophy in which he strives to reconcile pragmatism and a classical spiritual and religious perspective. He examines the work of Peirce, William James, Dewey, and Jesuit priest and anthropologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, arguing that the pragmatic notion of experience can be extended to include a classical spiritual and religious perspective in a theory of knowledge, morality, God, religion, and person. Annotation c. by Book News, Inc., Portland, Or.