The Washington Post
The effects of divorce, working mothers, changes in families' income and social position -- these and many other matters come under Conley's microscope. Though at times he comes up a bit short in his avowed desire to avoid writing sociologese, on the whole the book is lucid and provocative. Certainly it will make you think twice about how you became what you are, and if you're a parent it will -- or should -- make you think hard about the pecking order you've created and its potential influence on your children's lives. — Jonathan Yardley
Publishers Weekly
The surprising fact that sibling differences account for three-quarters of all differences between individuals in explaining American economic inequality acts as a challenge for NYU sociology professor Conley. Drawing on economic studies conducted by the U.S. Census, University of Michigan and University of Chicago, and interviewing hundreds of subjects, Conley illuminates provocative findings. Counter to the belief that birth order predicts a child's success and role within a family, he argues that what really matters is family size, parental time and attention, and how much of the family's financial resources are available for the child. Conley concludes from his findings that parents can more easily affect their children's development by their choices of family size and spacing of births than by attempts to move up the economic ladder. He is candid about the limitations of current surveys and discusses the complexities of studying an institution whose modern workings are contingent on slippery factors (e.g., gender, race, class). Despite all he's learned, the staggering number of factors affecting the workings of a family frustrates Conley's desire to come up with hard and fast rules. Yet from what he has found thus far, he can proclaim, "the family is not a haven in a harsh world. It is part and parcel of that world, rat race and all. Inequality, after all, starts at home." Although Conley's academic prose may challenge general readers, graduate students looking for thesis topics will be well served: he has tons of ideas where research could go to get more answers. Agent, Sydelle Kramer. (Mar. 2) Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
Library Journal
Why does one sibling "succeed"-attain social and economic status and advantage-while another does not? Challenging the classic nature/nurture and birth-order explanations as insufficient to explain disparate sibling success levels, Conley (sociology, NYU; Being Black, Living in the Red) utilizes three major national statistical studies and interviews with 175 siblings from 68 families. His analysis concludes that a wide array of factors within the family, shaped by and reflective of the greater society, drive the future status of individuals who share the same gene pool. Contending that "inequality starts at home," he details the impact of such factors as gender dynamics, the family's class position, and parental death or divorce on sibling success rates in the educational, occupational, and relational realms. Each chapter begins with a story or case study that personalizes the research, quickly engaging the reader. Readable, fascinating, and more accessible than former studies on sibling success (e.g., Koen Van Eijck's Family and Opportunity), Conley's book promises to be of interest to any public or academic library patron curious about sibling differences. [Previewed in Prepub Alert, LJ 11/15/03.]-Lori Carabello, Ephrata P.L., PA Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
The roles of nature, nurture, and birth order as they relate to socioeconomic success. "The family is not a haven in a harsh world," writes Conley (Sociology/NYU; Honky, 2000). "It is part and parcel of that world, rat race and all. Inequality, after all, starts at home." Or not, for the author finds that with adequate resources-time, money, connections-parents can compensate for natural disabilities and provide opportunities that those with attenuated resources could never deliver. Notions of nurturing and the tracking of genes simply do not explain socioeconomic success in and of themselves, declares Conley, supporting his thesis with as many anecdotal examples and study results as anyone could muster in hopes of vouching one position or another. Life is just too messy and complicated for a single explanation, and if there is a pecking order within the family unit, Conley suggests it will be "conditioned by the swirling winds of society that envelop the family," including gender expectations, the cost of schooling, the divorce rate, geographical mobility, religious and sexual orientations, not to mention plain luck either good (stumbling across mentors) or bad (lousy personal health), and-not to forget-nature, nurture, and birth order. Conley also figures degrees of trauma-death, incapacitation of a parent, desertion of a parent, divorce-and how they play upon the birth order if, for example, the oldest sibling has moved out before the trauma. He also investigates such issues as how younger members of the family understand the sacrifices of the older sibling when they have to toss all to help lend financial support. When no factor holds any definitive edge in explaining different levelsof sibling achievement, asks Conley, why accept anything less than more variables to the equation? Why indeed?Reveals a much more fascinatingly shaded world than that of those who choose either nature or nurture. Agent: Sydelle Kramer/Frances Goldin Agency