Overview
A GOOD TALK is an analysis of and guide to that most exclusively human of all activities— conversation.Drawing on over forty years of experience in American letters, Menaker pinpoints the factors that drive and enliven every good conversation: the vagaries (and joys) of subtext; the deeper structure and meaning of conversational flow; the subliminal signals that guide our disclosures and confessions; and the countless other hurdles we must clear along the way. Moving beyond self-help musings and "how to" advice, he has created a stylish, funny, and surprising book: a celebration of "the most excusively human of all activities."
In a time when conversation remains deeply important— for building relationships, for relaxing, even for figuring out who we are— and also increasingly imperiled (with Blackberries and texting increasingly in vogue), A GOOD TALK is a refreshing celebration of the subtle adventures of a good conversation.
Synopsis
A GOOD TALK is an analysis of and guide to that most exclusively human of all activities conversation.
Drawing on over forty years of experience in American letters, Menaker pinpoints the factors that drive and enliven every good conversation: the vagaries (and joys) of subtext; the deeper structure and meaning of conversational flow; the subliminal signals that guide our disclosures and confessions; and the countless other hurdles we must clear along the way. Moving beyond self-help musings and "how to" advice, he has created a stylish, funny, and surprising book: a celebration of "the most excusively human of all activities."
In a time when conversation remains deeply important for building relationships, for relaxing, even for figuring out who we are and also increasingly imperiled (with Blackberries and texting increasingly in vogue), A GOOD TALK is a refreshing celebration of the subtle adventures of a good conversation.
The Barnes & Noble Review
On any given day, everyone -- even a writer like me who toils in relative solitude -- engages in some sort of conversation with others. Whether we're ordering a coffee or attending a business meeting, family, friends, strangers and colleagues present myriad opportunities to talk. Daniel Menaker sees these interactions, whether simple or complex, as forms of art. "Conversations" he states convincingly, " definitely have noble benefits that transcend the merely pragmatic." In short, Menaker believes that a good talk -- attended to correctly -- has the power to ease ills from the personal to the global.
If you imagine that A Good Talk goes on to read like some passionate lament on the increasing scarcity of such interactions and the evils of technology, you’d be wrong. While Menaker does address the encroachment of email, texting and instant messaging on good, old-fashioned face-to-face chatting, the central premise is to illuminate the parts of conversation (in his terms, survey, discovery, risks and roles) what they reveal about the participants.
To illustrate this, Menaker doesn't settle for any single strategy -- his approach is comprehensive. He taps the epistles and barstool interactions of the historically loquacious such as Socrates and Montaigne, transcribes a luncheon conversation with a younger writer, and includes a helpful and hilarious section of FAQs (Frequently Arising Quandaries) on what to do when you’ve forgotten someone’s name or are seated next to a bore, or both! He also offers a chapter on how conversation -- and, more importantly, reflecting on it afterthe fact -- produces chemical benefits inthe brain. In keeping with his theory that the accomplished conversationalist must possess three key traits: curiosity, humor and impudence, Menaker peppers the entire narrative with a liberal dose of uproarious personal anecdotes and observations.
The overall effect is as satisfying as a long talk with a particularly intelligent friend, with plenty of food for later thought. The only thing left to say? “Thank you for a lovely time Mr. Menaker. I look forward to continuing the conversation.”
--Reviewed by Lydia DishmanEditorials
Lisa Bonos
Reading about conversation might seem paradoxical: a solitary take on a social activity. But Daniel Menaker's A Good Talk evokes its subject by taking on a personal, conversational tone. Menaker draws on a wide array of sources—from Socrates to Samuel Johnson to Deborah Tannen—to explain how conversation has evolved and how it works—or doesn't.—The Washington Post
Megan Buskey
It takes nerve to write a book about conversation, given the well-conceived examples already on the market—Cicero, anyone? In this breezy primer, Menaker…adds an urbane, contemporary cast to the discussion of what makes for good talk and why…Menaker's analysis is generally sound and insightful.—The New York Times
Publishers Weekly
A fiction writer and former editor at the New Yorker and Random House, Menaker (The Treatment) regards conversation as “a human art of great importance produced by all people everywhere.” His witty approach is evident almost immediately, as he speculates on the creation of human language, moving on to the general rules of conversation, London coffeehouses as a forum for ideas, greetings, and name-droppers: “They wrap the pig of name-dropping in a blanket of casualness, or even criticalness, and seem to actually believe you won't taste the inner wiener.” At the book's core is a conversation between Menaker and an anonymous female writer. Taped in a Brooklyn restaurant, this lengthy transcript is analyzed in detail to show how the participants take risks, seek a “common ground,” interject humor, and discover perceptive insights about each other. Interview tactics and prepared remarks are covered, along with e-mail embarrassments, dating stratagems, sarcastic barbs, compliments, and interruptions. However, what makes a lasting impression is the parade of anecdotes about life in the corridors of the New Yorker and Random House, leaving the reader yearning for a full-scale Menaker memoir. (Jan.)Library Journal
A 26-year veteran of The New Yorker, Menaker here probes the origin and subtexts of everyday human interactions, exploring how conversations take shape and progress. At their best, they're a form of art, but conversation is not always smooth and charming. For people who often find their way into conversational pitfalls, Menaker packs an entire chapter full of advice. He differentiates between conversation that's aimless and purposeless and, among other topics, takes aim at name-droppers. In the hands of a less-skilled writer, this topic could have drowned in textbook-style overanalysis, but Menaker's book is filled with ample doses of humor and should be especially welcomed by wordsmiths and conversationalists.Kirkus Reviews
A former book editor and New Yorker staffer weighs in on the history, strategies and significance of conversation, "a human art of great importance produced by all people everywhere."Menaker (The Treatment, 1998, etc.), has a busy agenda: to sketch the history of human spoken intercourse, which "had to begin with grunts"; summarize some key theories about the nature of talk; analyze an edited, though lengthy, version of a recording of an actual conversation he shared with a colleague (she knew the recorder was running); examine conversation-starters and -stoppers; and offer some Dr. Philian how-to-do-it banalities. Menaker's wit is evident throughout, and the tone is generally amiable, even avuncular-and yes, conversational. He employs self-deprecation appealingly, and his allusions leap around unpredictably, visiting both high and low culture along the way. Accordingly, the author glances at Beethoven, Randy Travis, Aristotle, William Shawn, Buddy Holly, Grendel, Linda Blair, Gary Cooper and Max von Sydow, among dozens of others. Menaker has little ill to say of anyone, though he takes a poke at Alan Cheuse and at some unnamed people who once said something inappropriate in conversation with him. Of greatest interest are some early comments about the evolution of conversation and some observations at the end about oxytocin, the "cuddle hormone" that apparently bubbles away nicely during and after a good chat. Less appealing are the author's self-help prescriptions-lists of dos and don'ts and anecdotes about people who did X and Y ensued. Some of the sections seem more fitting for an in-flight magazine than for a serious discussion of . . . discussion. A thin broth containing a few chunkymorsels. Agent: Esther Newberg/ICMThe Barnes & Noble Review
On any given day, everyone -- even a writer like me who toils in relative solitude -- engages in some sort of conversation with others. Whether we're ordering a coffee or attending a business meeting, family, friends, strangers and colleagues present myriad opportunities to talk. Daniel Menaker sees these interactions, whether simple or complex, as forms of art. "Conversations" he states convincingly, " definitely have noble benefits that transcend the merely pragmatic." In short, Menaker believes that a good talk -- attended to correctly -- has the power to ease ills from the personal to the global.
If you imagine that A Good Talk goes on to read like some passionate lament on the increasing scarcity of such interactions and the evils of technology, you’d be wrong. While Menaker does address the encroachment of email, texting and instant messaging on good, old-fashioned face-to-face chatting, the central premise is to illuminate the parts of conversation (in his terms, survey, discovery, risks and roles) what they reveal about the participants.
To illustrate this, Menaker doesn't settle for any single strategy -- his approach is comprehensive. He taps the epistles and barstool interactions of the historically loquacious such as Socrates and Montaigne, transcribes a luncheon conversation with a younger writer, and includes a helpful and hilarious section of FAQs (Frequently Arising Quandaries) on what to do when you’ve forgotten someone’s name or are seated next to a bore, or both! He also offers a chapter on how conversation -- and, more importantly, reflecting on it afterthe fact -- produces chemical benefits inthe brain. In keeping with his theory that the accomplished conversationalist must possess three key traits: curiosity, humor and impudence, Menaker peppers the entire narrative with a liberal dose of uproarious personal anecdotes and observations.
The overall effect is as satisfying as a long talk with a particularly intelligent friend, with plenty of food for later thought. The only thing left to say? “Thank you for a lovely time Mr. Menaker. I look forward to continuing the conversation.”
--Reviewed by Lydia Dishman