Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
Although most modern scholars doubt the historicity of King Arthur, parts of the legend were accepted as fact throughout the Middle Ages. Medieval accounts of the historical Arthur, however, present a very different king from the romances that are widely studied today. Richard Moll examines a wide variety of historical texts including Thomas Gray's Scalacronica and John Hardyng's Chronicle to explore the relationship between the Arthurian chronicles and the romances. He demonstrates how competing and conflicting traditions interacted with one another, and how writers and readers of Arthurian texts negotiated a complex textual tradition.
Moll asserts that the enormous variety and number of existing chronicles demonstrates the immense popularity of the historical Arthur in medieval England. Since these chronicles were the dominant source of Arthurian information for the late medieval reader, they provide an invaluable, and neglected, interpretive context for modern readers of Malory and other later medieval romances. The first monograph to look at the impact of these historical texts on Arthurian literature, Before Malory is also the first to show how canonical vernacular romances interacted with chronicle texts that have since dropped out of the canon.
Synopsis
All modern renderings of the Arthurian legend must contain--or at least not contradict--crucial elements of the story as told by Malory in order to be considered authentic, points out Moll (English, Villanova U.). Before Malory however, that is before his work became the standard, there was another Arthur, one of the chroniclers. Both romance writers and chroniclers assumed Arthur was a historical figure, he says, but the former had little concern for what was fact and fiction, whereas the latter attempted to make their accounts as historical as possible, and so patterned them on what was accepted as history at the time. Annotation ©2004 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR