Law, General
Log in to track your reading progress.
Editorials
Publishers Weekly -
The first black professor tenured at Harvard Law School, Bell (Faces at the Bottom of the Well) lost his job in 1992 after protesting-by taking an unpaid leave of absence-the school's failure to hire and tenure a woman of color. Reflecting first on his youth and career as a civil rights laywer, Bell offers a candid tale of infighting at Harvard Law. The school, he argues persuasively, places more emphasis on paper credentials than proven skills, thus limiting faculty diversity of race, sex and class. During his first year of protest, Bell agreed to teach a seminar at Harvard for free; in his second year, he was a visiting teacher at New York University Law School, where he remains. He describes how warring ideological factions defeated the appointment of a black woman candidate at Harvard Law. The officials there refused to waive a rule limiting faculty leaves to two years, and Bell was fired as he began his third year of protest. While a few observations here ring false-do students really not protest poor teaching by white professors?-Bell raises important questions about institutional racism and offers resonant thoughts on the tradition of protest and its importance to self-esteem. 25,000 first printing; author tour. (Oct.)Library Journal
Bell provides a detailed account of the events that led him to give up his position as a Harvard Law School professor to protest the school's never having granted tenure to a minority woman. (LJ 9/15/94)Roland Wulbert
Bell, the first tenured black in Harvard history, protested Harvard Law School's hiring policies and was fired for his pains. But those expecting either recrimination or a mercilessly logical legal brief from him may be surprised and perhaps puzzled. Bell prefaces each chapter with an episode in the conflict between the Citadel and the lowlanders--a fable of race relations in America, to be sure, but also something more, as is the nonfictional body of the book. To some extent, Bell's protest is an excuse to disclose behind-the-scenes social relations at Harvard Law, and the thematic sections are more literary meditation on protest than an exhortation to take sides. For Bell, "protest" means solitary action closer to ethics than the committee meetings and chains of command of political organizations, and the moral ambivalence involved in protest is a theme to which he always returns. Bell urges us to follow his lead but reminds us that good guys find themselves unemployed and that when virtue is its own reward, it may be no reward at all.Book Details
Published
November 1, 1994
Publisher
Beacon Press
Pages
208
Format
Hardcover
ISBN
9780807009260