Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Synopsis
In The End of Art, Donald Kuspit argues that art is over because it has lost its aesthetic import.
Library Journal
Renowned art critic Kuspit's proclamation in the title of his latest book seems to come a bit after the fact. Haven't we already heard the wailing sirens from art manifestos and writers alike, including Suzi Gablik's Has Modernism Failed? (1985), Arthur Danto's After the End of Art (1998), or Hans Belting's The End of the History of Art? (1987)? This diatribe by Kuspit (The Rebirth of Painting in the Late 20th Century) might not be particularly original, but it is brave and unwavering in its opinion that art is over and "postart" (performance artist Allan Kaprow's term) is its unfortunate replacement. Many influential European thinkers like Adorno, Benjamin, and Baudelaire haunt Kuspit's cranky objections to postart, which he generalizes as commercial, running on empty, playing to the crowd, banal, unsatisfying, soulless, secular, and corrupt. Kuspit boldly blames newly resurrected 20th-century masters like Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol for the state of things today but finds glimmers of hope in the "New Old Masters" (Paula Rego, Michael David, etc.), who retain a little faith-and tradition. Recommended for larger libraries as a solid (if biased) introduction to modern and postmodern art and all its conflicted meanings.-Prudence Peiffer, Cambridge, MA Copyright 2004 Reed Business Information.