Overview
Scandals in business and government, technological developments, a growing sensitivity to issues of gender and race, a reaction against the excessive theoretical detachment of much modern philosophy have brought ethics to the forefront of public consciousness. In high schools, colleges, and universities, and professional schools, courses in ethics are increasingly in demand. In this bibliography, a leading scholar in the field provides an annotated guide to resources.Synopsis
Written for high school and undergraduate students, the second volume of this three-volume reference contains 1,007 entries, over 200 of them new to this edition; the remainder have been revised. Coverage includes terms and theories, the ethical aspects of the lives of well-known figures, events, writings, situations, social mores, and policies. New to this edition is an increased focus on applied ethics. Each entry begins with an initial overview, giving a definition, date, type of ethics, and brief description of significance. A short essay follows, concluding with cross references and, in many cases, a list of further reading. A sampling of topics: alienation, Asoka, bystander, Children's Bureau, downsizing, Louis Farrakhan, gossip, Ibn Gabirol, limited war, George Orwell, robotics, sales ethics, and whistleblowing. Six appendices present a bibliography, biographical directory, glossary, Nobel Peace Prize winners, organizations, and time line of primary works. Both a name and a subject index are included. The entries were written by 366 academics in the US; editor Roth is in the department of philosophy and religious studies at the Claremont McKenna College in California. Annotation ©2004 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Library Journal
Quite generally, encyclopedias are either carefully reasoned contributions to their subjects (e.g., Encyclopedia of Ethics, LJ 6/15/92) or, like this work, simple summaries either of what other people have said or of historical data. The difference does not mark the second kind as defective but only as having a different aim and audience. Ethics includes 819 alphabetically arranged articles of 250 to 3000 words, covering standard ethical concepts, institutions, distinguished people, ethically significant events, human behavior, and issues of applied ethics. Each entry of at least 1000 words includes a five-to ten-title bibliography, and all entries are cross-referenced and indexed alphabetically. The work also has about 200 graphic elements, some of which (e.g., chronologies, statistical data, etc.) are useful. Each entry relates its subject to a particular "type" of ethics (e.g., personal and social, military, civil rights, etc.), suggests the subject's significance (e.g., "focuses attention on x"), and defines the entry-term. The work is readable enough, but the conceptual entries in particular often muddle things by proceeding from faulty definitions, by stating something without explaining or analyzing it, by mistaking one thing for another, by oversimplifying, by ignoring a crucial distinction, or simply by inattention. There are serious omissions: harm, need, want, weakness of will, cost-benefit analysis, interpersonal comparison, wisdom, paternalism, right/obligation, A. Gewirth, H.L.A. Hart, R.B. Perry, etc. The length of entries is sometimes inappropriate (e.g., R.M. Hare gets as much space as Jacques Derrida and Bertrand Russell, and rape consumes about seven columns while utilitarianism and justice take about two each). Bibliographies sometimes fail to cite significant orthodox criticism of the views set forth in the entries (e.g., D. Ehrenfeld's criticism of humanism), cite inappropriately difficult works (e.g., anyone trying to leap from the justice-entry to John Rawls's A Theory of Justice probably will plunge to his or her philosophical death), or omit obviously first-rate items (e.g., Max Black's essay on deriving an ought-statement from is statements). The better entries are those requiring no conceptual analysis but only factual accuracy (e.g., those on the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Watergate break-in). However, bias mars even some factual entries. Thus, the entry on nuclear energy mentions U.S., English, and Soviet reactor accidents but not France's extensive accident-free production of nuclear energy. Summarily, then, and subject to the qualifications already expressed, this encyclopedia is mediocre. It need not have been, as for example the excellent entry "Professional Ethics" shows. To the general reader, for whom it is evidently intended, it can provide information but not understanding.-Robert Hoffman, York Coll., CUNY