Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Synopsis
By 1996, the state had transferred most of the agricultural land in Ukraine to collective and private ownership, but 40% still remains in state ownership. The individual sector, including household plots and private farms, now cultivates 15% of land in the country and accounts for a substantial share of products sold in the marketplace. Yet the growth of private farming has slowed down after a vigorous start, and the number of independent family farms appears to have stabilized at around 33,000 at least temporarily. Internal restructuring of collectives is only beginning. The distribution of land and asset shares has been completed in about half the farms surveyed, and most farms still retain central management. The new shareholders and other employees fail to discern significant changes following formal reorganization of their farm enterprises. Ukrainian agriculture remains dominated by large collective structures that still operate according to old principles, and the recorded diversity of new organizational forms is nothing more than a result of "changing the sign on the door." This has resulted in a distinct deterioration of their financial performance. The new private farms, on the other hand, appear to be fairly profitable. Yet most rural residents prefer to invest their land and asset shares in the local farm enterprises rather than risk private farming. The findings of the study suggest that land reform in Ukraine is in a danger of stagnation. The government must make every possible effort to create the necessary institutioal and market conditions for injecting the stagnating reforms with renewed vigor.