Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
From landmark court cases on affirmative action to their consequences, a study on why such preferences are morally wrong, unlawful, and indefensible.
Synopsis
From landmark court cases on affirmative action to their consequences, a study on why such preferences are morally wrong, unlawful, and indefensible.
Publishers Weekly
Cohen (Civil Disobedience), a philosophy professor at the University of Michigan, offers carefully argued critiques of what he calls the often-contorted reasoning behind judicial decisions upholding affirmative action. In this collection (mainly articles previously published in law reviews and magazines such as Commentary), Cohen deconstructs notable cases (e.g., Bakke and Weber) and analyzes such issues as the vaguely defined legal standards (e.g., a ``compelling'' government interest). However, Cohen's antipathy toward racial preference does not extend to other preferential programs (What about gender? Alumni legacies?), and his proffered solution-policies that do not involve classification by race-doesn't necessarily address our society's embedded racism. (Oct.)