Overview
The time has come for a serious debate on the future involvement of the United States in the Middle East and this original and provocative analysis challenges the prevailing wisdom of the Washington foreign policy establishment. Hadar provides a sweeping reexamination of the conceptual bases of American policy and proposes a strategy of "constructive disengagement" from the region, a policy of benign neglect as a way of promoting the interests of the United States as well as those of the people of the Middle East. Hadar calls for regional states and the European Union to take increased responsibility for security, economic growth, and political stability. This bold and innovative critique will inject new energy into the policy debate.
Synopsis
Although he believes that US interventionism in the Middle East was justified in the context of the Cold War, Hadar (Research Fellow in Foreign Policy Studies, Cato Institute) argues that the collapse of the Soviet Union should have led to a "constructive disengagement" with the region and that the failure to do so has led inexorably to a "destructive disengagement" in which the United States has to use its military power and economic resources to deal with growing challenges to its hegemony from regional and global actors. In order to address this intractable problem, he suggests, he US should adopt policies advocated by such foreign policy figures a Zbigniew Brzezinsky and Brent Scowcroft to act forcefully resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, to adopt less ambitious plans for political change in the Middle East, and to move toward a clear "division of labor" between the US and Europe in securing Western interests in the region. Since these measures will only help reduce short- and mid-term costs, he goes beyond them in arguing that Europe should be encouraged to take the place of the US as the "balancer of last resort" in the region, in order to avoid the type of Euro-American conflict presaged by the invasion of Iraq. Annotation ©2006 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Editorials
From the Publisher
"Hadar writes with a flair not often found in foreign-policy writing, borrowing heavily from pop culture for his chapter titles and using the perspectives of sociology and the hard sciences to explain and illuminate his points. This style has the effect of pushing the reader outside the worn-out language of the Arab-Israel conflict and the Middle East peace process, and the conventional terminology of foreign policy. His style complements the boldness of his suggestions and the strength of his argumentation in achieving his primary objective: stimulating new thinking about the U.S. role in the Middle East."—Middle East Policy "Leon Hadar's fine book Sandstorm starkly outlines differing U.S. and European interests in the Middle East. His prescription for U.S. disengagement from the region is sound, well argued, and based on an incisive reading of legitimate U.S. national interests. His argument for greater European involvement — if only for self-defense — seems irrefutable. Given the internal security and immigration disasters the EC has fastened on Europe, it will be interesting to see if Mr. Hadar's advice is followed or if, as usual, the Europeans are content to hope the alligator eats them last."— Michael F. Scheuer, author of Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror"You don't have to agree with every observation or proposal in Leon Hadar's book to applaud the bravery and importance of his analysis. The United States needs a fundamental reconsideration of its approach to the Persian Gulf and the Middle East. 'Sandstorm' is a big help in this effort."—James Fallows, National Correspondent, The Atlantic Monthly
"Leon Hadar's Sandstorm provides a tour-de-force of America's past and current engagement in the Middle East and correctly argues that neither neoconservative idealism nor left-ish sentimentalism will fix America's hemorrhaging Middle East problem. He suggests an alternative course - a hard-nosed, interest-driven strategy which would be good for American interests but also good for Europe, Israel, and the broader arena of nations in the Middle East. I highly recommend it."—Steven Clemons, Executive Vice President, New America Foundation
"Hadar makes the lucid and much needed argument that Americans have better choices in the Middle East than the commonplace Beltway establishment options of 'Empire' and 'Empire Lite.'"—Scott McConnell, Executive Editor, The American Conservative
"Leon Hadar bravely predicted many of the consequences that would flow from U.S. involvement in the first Gulf War and was almost alone is doing so. Now he has written another bold book on Middle East issues. He should be read, in part because so few others are willing to explore the issues he tackles."—Charles William Maynes, President, Eurasia Foundation