Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
This new, thoroughly recast Second Edition has been acclaimed as "the most important book written since the beginning of that strange project called bioethics" (Stanley Hauerwas, Duke University). Its philosophical exploration of the foundations of secular bioethics has been substantially expanded. The book challenges the values of much of contemporary bioethics and health care policy by confronting their failure to secure the moral norms they seek to apply. The nature of health and disease, the definition of death, the morality of abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, germline genetic engineering, triage decisions and distributive justice in health care are all addressed within an integrated reconsideration of bioethics as a whole. New material has been added regarding social justice, health care reform and environmental ethics. The very possibility and meaning of a secular bioethics are re-explored.
Appropriate for: Medical Ethicists.
Synopsis
This is the first single-author text on the philosophical issues in bioethics that is both systematic and comprehensive. Engelhardt provides both a critique of the theoretical foundations of bioethics and an analysis of the problematic ways in which facts, theories and values become intertwined in concepts of health and disease. He analyzes patients' rights, including the right to free and informed consent, to refuse treatment, and to the benefits of health care. Covering topics that range from abortion and in vitro fertilization to sexual deviance and organ transplantation. Englehardt offers a critical and at times controversial analysis, defending such practices as fetal experimentation and limited infanticide.
Doody Review Services
Reviewer:Patricia A. Marshall, PhD(Loyola University Medical Center)
Description:This book explores the possibility of secular philosophical reasoning for moral collaboration between individuals with profoundly diverse perspectives and values. The first edition of this book was published in 1986. This second edition reconsiders the intellectual bases of bioethics and topics such as the nature of the person and definitions of death in a multicultural world. New material is included on the allocation of scarce resources and healthcare reform.
Purpose:Engelhardt aims to develop a moral justification for a secular ethic. He argues against universalizing agendas in contemporary bioethics. He believes that all forms of moral commitments in large-scale secular societies should be private because of the diverse spectrum of competing moralities. Yet, he does not minimize the significance of specific moral traditions. Engelhardt attempts to dispel criticisms that the first edition was his libertarian manifesto. For example, the principle of autonomy is renamed the "principle of permission" to emphasize that secular moral authority involves necessarily the acquiescence of individuals united by a common concern. Overall, Engelhardt is successful in achieving his objectives for the book.
Audience:This book would interest healthcare providers and policy analysts, bioethicists, philosophers, and social scientists. It would be particularly interesting for those who are familiar with Engelhardt's earlier articulation of secular ethics.
Features:The book includes extensive notes and references at the end of each chapter. The index is extremely helpful in locating discussions of specific topics and individuals.
Assessment:Confusion and disagreements will arise inevitably in the search for effective ways to resolve moral dilemmas in a multicultural society. Engelhardt does not suggest that a secular philosophical approach is the only response to ethical controversy in the face of moral diversity. However, he develops a strong justification for this approach because of its potential for eliciting cooperation between moral strangers. This book contributes substantially to the literature on bioethics in a postmodern world. It is insightful and well written. I recommend it highly.
Editorials
From The Critics
Reviewer: Patricia A. Marshall, PhD(Loyola University Medical Center)Description: This book explores the possibility of secular philosophical reasoning for moral collaboration between individuals with profoundly diverse perspectives and values. The first edition of this book was published in 1986. This second edition reconsiders the intellectual bases of bioethics and topics such as the nature of the person and definitions of death in a multicultural world. New material is included on the allocation of scarce resources and healthcare reform.
Purpose: Engelhardt aims to develop a moral justification for a secular ethic. He argues against universalizing agendas in contemporary bioethics. He believes that all forms of moral commitments in large-scale secular societies should be private because of the diverse spectrum of competing moralities. Yet, he does not minimize the significance of specific moral traditions. Engelhardt attempts to dispel criticisms that the first edition was his libertarian manifesto. For example, the principle of autonomy is renamed the "principle of permission" to emphasize that secular moral authority involves necessarily the acquiescence of individuals united by a common concern. Overall, Engelhardt is successful in achieving his objectives for the book.
Audience: This book would interest healthcare providers and policy analysts, bioethicists, philosophers, and social scientists. It would be particularly interesting for those who are familiar with Engelhardt's earlier articulation of secular ethics.
Features: The book includes extensive notes and references at the end of each chapter. The index is extremely helpful in locating discussions of specific topics and individuals.
Assessment: Confusion and disagreements will arise inevitably in the search for effective ways to resolve moral dilemmas in a multicultural society. Engelhardt does not suggest that a secular philosophical approach is the only response to ethical controversy in the face of moral diversity. However, he develops a strong justification for this approach because of its potential for eliciting cooperation between moral strangers. This book contributes substantially to the literature on bioethics in a postmodern world. It is insightful and well written. I recommend it highly.