Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Synopsis
In this first sustained critique of current-traditional rhetorical theory, Sharon Crowley uses a postmodern, deconstructive reading to examine the historical development of current-traditional rhetoric. She identifies it (as well as the British new rhetoric from which it developed) as a philosophy of language use, not a rhetorical theory, and she argues that its use as such has led to a misrepresentation of invention.
Crowley contends that current-traditional rhetoric continues to prosper because a considerable number of college composition teachers—graduate students, part-time instructors, and teachers of literature—are not involved in the development of the curriculum they are asked to teach. As a result, important voices, necessary to create any true representation of the composition teaching experience, are denied access to the scholarly conversations evaluating the soundness of this approach.
Booknews
Crowley (English, Northern Arizona U.) uses a postmodern, deconstructive reading to examine the historical development of current-traditional rhetoric. She identifies it as a philosophy of language use, not a rhetorical theory, argues that its use as a theory has led to a misrepresentation of invention, and seeks to discover why current-traditional thought still exerts such a powerful influence on writing instruction. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)