Join Books.org — it's free

Supreme Court - General & Miscellaneous, African Americans - Politics and Government - History, United States History - Politics & Government, Judicial System - General & Miscellaneous, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, African Americans - Law, Pol
The Prince and the Pauper by John L. Cooper β€” book cover

The Prince and the Pauper

by John L. Cooper
Available on Bookshop Write a review

Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.

Log in to track your reading progress.

Overview

Justice Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court should be impeached.

The subject of this essay is Clarence Thomas, his elevation to the Supreme Court, and the political process that put him there. When President George H. Bush nominated him to sit on the Court, his name produced a great deal of consternation in the liberal community. Thomas was the product of a very controversial public career. He was identified as a person who had been insensitive to the civil rights of minorities, women and elderly people when he had been a top administrator at the Department of Education and Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). As well, being a politically conservative black man, he did not appear to be suitable as a replacement for the retiring liberal justice Thurgood Marshall.

Moreover, on moral and ethical grounds, Thomas had a dubious professional record that demonstrated a failure to respect the courts and the law. To be sure, there were legitimate questions about his qualifications to be a member of the highest judicial body in the land. Nevertheless, President Bush wanted Thomas on the Supreme Court, and he played hardball partisan politics to achieve that end.

Synopsis

Justice Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court should be impeached.

The subject of this essay is Clarence Thomas, his elevation to the Supreme Court, and the political process that put him there. When President George H. Bush nominated him to sit on the Court, his name produced a great deal of consternation in the liberal community. Thomas was the product of a very controversial public career. He was identified as a person who had been insensitive to the civil rights of minorities, women and elderly people when he had been a top administrator at the Department of Education and Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). As well, being a politically conservative black man, he did not appear to be suitable as a replacement for the retiring liberal justice Thurgood Marshall.

Moreover, on moral and ethical grounds, Thomas had a dubious professional record that demonstrated a failure to respect the courts and the law. To be sure, there were legitimate questions about his qualifications to be a member of the highest judicial body in the land. Nevertheless, President Bush wanted Thomas on the Supreme Court, and he played hardball partisan politics to achieve that end.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet. Log in to write one.

Book Details

Published
March 1, 2001
Publisher
iUniverse, Incorporated
Pages
124
Format
Paperback
ISBN
9780595171798

More by John L. Cooper

Similar books