Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
Sheckels provides the first book-length study of Congressional debating. The limited work on the topic in the communication discipline has argued that such debating is tedious and inconsequential. Sheckels, however, offers a new paradigm, derived from the work of Mikhail Bakhtin, that counteracts this assumption. This paradigm also counters the often unvoiced assumption that debates are inherently biopolar with the initial premise that they are instead polyphonic. The polyphony, however, goes beyond the recognition of the multiple speakers who participate and the drama they enact, to the awareness of the voices these speakers introduce within their discourse. These voices range from the words of authorities to the narratives of average Americans, from classical prosopopoeia to what Bakhtin terms stylization. Speakers also sometimes enact what Bakhtin terms double-voiced discourse; furthermore, there are moments of what Bakhtin terms carnivalesque energy. Bakhtin's work finally alerts the critic to the illusion of finalizability in Congressional debates.
After outlining this paradigm, Sheckels uses it to examine six Congressional debates, ranging in date from a 1960 Senate filibuster on a civil rights matter to the 1999 House debate on articles of impeachment and includes analyses of such flash points as the Confederate flag, sexual harassment in the military, and partial-birth abortion. These case studies reveal both the utility and the flexibility of the Bakhtinian perspective. Thoughtful analyses that will be of great interest to scholars and researchers involved with rhetoric and political communication.
Synopsis
A new perspective on Congressional debating derived from the theoretical work of Mikhail Bakhtin.
Booknews
Reviews the existing literature on debates in the House and Senate, and extracts from the work of Mikhail Bakhtin a critical methodology designed to serve as a heuristic prompt for fuller examination. Offers five case studies of debates in the US Senate from the 1990s and the 1960s, along with essays that provide insight on rhetorical issues surrounding the particular debates. Debates are on topics such as use of the Confederate flag, partial-birth abortion, the poll tax, and the impeachment of President Clinton. Sheckels teaches English and communication at Randolph-Macon College. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)