Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
Presidents are surrounded by political strategists and White House counsel who presumably know enough to avoid making the same mistakes as their predecessors. Why, then, do the same kinds of presidential failures occur over and over again? Why Presidents Fail answers this question by examining presidential fiascos, quagmires, and risky business-the kind of failure that led President Kennedy to groan after the Bay of Pigs invasion, "How could I have been so stupid?" In this book, Richard M. Pious looks at nine cases that have become defining events in presidencies from Dwight D. Eisenhower and the U-2 Flights to George W. Bush and Iraqi WMDs. He uses these cases to draw generalizations about presidential power, authority, rationality, and legitimacy. And he raises questions about the limits of presidential decision-making, many of which fly in the face of the conventional wisdom about the modern presidency.
Synopsis
Why Presidents Fail takes a fresh look at cases that became defining events in presidencies from Dwight D. Eisenhower through George W. Bush and uses these cases to draw generalizations about presidential power, authority, rationality, and legitimacy. Rather than assigning blame for past failures, this book focuses on why presidents fail and how future presidents might avoid making these same disastrous mistakes.
Publishers Weekly
Barnard College political science professor Pious examines nine episodes in presidential politics from the past 60 years that illustrate the "fiascoes... 'deep doo-doo'...quagmires and swamps and risky business" that shake even the most powerful office in the free world. Pious has no shortage of material: among other events presented for consideration are the Bay of Pigs, Iran-Contra, the first Bush's "read my lips" tax promise, Clinton-era health care and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Rather than "assigning blame after the fact," Pious discusses theories of politics, presidential decision-making and advisors, and how presidential actions play with voters to determine "how presidents might avoid crash-and-burn events in the future." For solutions, Barnard looks to "emerging sciences" like risk management, operations research, and information theory to create "robust decision making systems: those that will operate reliably even when component parts are unreliable and interact unpredictably." Pious has researched each case in great detail, yielding much information that may be new to readers, and provides a thorough bibliography. Appropriate for high school and college study, this will also have great appeal for devotees of poli-sci and presidential history.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Editorials
CHOICE -
Government executives, for their part, should be required to study this book closely and incorporate the lessons of executive failure. Highly recommended.George C. Edwards III
Why Presidents Fail will engage students and educate us all. Filled with wisdom and innovative thinking, it is a volume everyone interested in the presidency will want to read.James Pfiffner
As Richard Pious traces the anatomy of presidential failures, he argues that, under conditions of high pressure and great uncertainty, presidents too often engage in “situational constitutionalism” and fail to distinguish between their personal stakes and the nation’s best interests. His carefully reconstructed and detailed case studies do not present merely the conventional wisdom about some obvious presidential blunders, but include incisive analyses of the underlying dynamics of presidential failures that contain important lessons for future presidents and citizens alike.Public Administration Review
His particular lens of anaylsis deepens our understanding of how presidents come to make failed policy choices.CHOICE -
Government executives, for their part, should be required to study this book closely and incorporate the lessons of executive failure. Highly recommended.Publishers Weekly
Barnard College political science professor Pious examines nine episodes in presidential politics from the past 60 years that illustrate the "fiascoes... 'deep doo-doo'...quagmires and swamps and risky business" that shake even the most powerful office in the free world. Pious has no shortage of material: among other events presented for consideration are the Bay of Pigs, Iran-Contra, the first Bush's "read my lips" tax promise, Clinton-era health care and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Rather than "assigning blame after the fact," Pious discusses theories of politics, presidential decision-making and advisors, and how presidential actions play with voters to determine "how presidents might avoid crash-and-burn events in the future." For solutions, Barnard looks to "emerging sciences" like risk management, operations research, and information theory to create "robust decision making systems: those that will operate reliably even when component parts are unreliable and interact unpredictably." Pious has researched each case in great detail, yielding much information that may be new to readers, and provides a thorough bibliography. Appropriate for high school and college study, this will also have great appeal for devotees of poli-sci and presidential history.Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Library Journal
In this scholarly book, Pious (American studies, Barnard Coll.; The War on Terrorism and the Rule of Law) addresses the problems of executive-branch shortcomings by using risk-management theory to illustrate the common denominator of all presidential failures. He analyzes egregious mistakes across party lines from Eisenhower to the current administration and postulates that it isn't the type of decision that leads to failure but inherent flaws in the way risk is ascertained by those in power. A lack of credible information, the prevalence of political posturing by staff, and weak adversarial understanding are some of the culprits. Unfortunately, Pious's prescribed solutions-e.g., shrinking the sphere of the President's personal influence to streamline decision making, eliminating bloated bureaucracy, and assuring that the executive branch uses political research instead of creating it-are not simple or easily applicable. This well-written work, which includes extensive footnotes and resources for further study, is recommended for academic libraries.
—Elizabeth White