Books.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
In recent decades, issues that reside at the center of philosophical and psychological inquiry have been absorbed into a scientific framework variously identified as "brain science," "cognitive science," and "cognitive neuroscience." Scholars have heralded this development as revolutionary, but a revolution implies an existing method has been overturned in favor of something new. What long-held theories have been abandoned or significantly modified in light of cognitive neuroscience?
Consciousness and Mental Life questions our present approach to the study of consciousness and the way modern discoveries either mirror or contradict understandings reached in the centuries leading up to our own. Daniel N. Robinson does not wage an attack on the emerging discipline of cognitive science. Rather, he provides the necessary historical context to properly evaluate the relationship between issues of consciousness and neuroscience and their evolution over time.
Robinson begins with Aristotle and the ancient Greeks and continues through to René Descartes, David Hume, William James, Daniel Dennett, John Searle, Richard Rorty, Hilary Putnam, and Derek Parfit. Approaching the issue from both a philosophical and a psychological perspective, Robinson identifies what makes the study of consciousness so problematic and asks whether cognitive neuroscience can truly reveal the origins of mental events, emotions, and preference, or if these occurrences are better understood by studying the whole person, not just the brain. Well-reasoned and thoroughly argued, Consciousness and Mental Life corrects many claims made about the success of brain science and provides a valuable historical context for the study of human consciousness.
Columbia University Press
Synopsis
In recent decades, issues that reside at the center of philosophical and psychological inquiry have been absorbed into a scientific framework variously identified as "brain science," "cognitive science," and "cognitive neuroscience." Scholars have heralded this development as revolutionary, but a revolution implies an existing method has been overturned in favor of something new. What long-held theories have been abandoned or significantly modified in light of cognitive neuroscience?
Consciousness and Mental Life questions our present approach to the study of consciousness and the way modern discoveries either mirror or contradict understandings reached in the centuries leading up to our own. Daniel N. Robinson does not wage an attack on the emerging discipline of cognitive science. Rather, he provides the necessary historical context to properly evaluate the relationship between issues of consciousness and neuroscience and their evolution over time.
Robinson begins with Aristotle and the ancient Greeks and continues through to René Descartes, David Hume, William James, Daniel Dennett, John Searle, Richard Rorty, Hilary Putnam, and Derek Parfit. Approaching the issue from both a philosophical and a psychological perspective, Robinson identifies what makes the study of consciousness so problematic and asks whether cognitive neuroscience can truly reveal the origins of mental events, emotions, and preference, or if these occurrences are better understood by studying the whole person, not just the brain. Well-reasoned and thoroughly argued, Consciousness and Mental Life corrects many claims made about the success of brain science and provides a valuable historical context for the study of human consciousness.
Scott Duimstra - Library Journal
In this short yet engaging book, Robinson (philosophy, Oxford Univ.) examines past and current theories on consciousness to see what we have accomplished in understanding the relationship between the mind and the body. He explains that, while the physical sciences have found answers to many of life's mysteries, a scientific framework may not be the correct model for understanding the mind/body relationship. According to Robinson, modern theories in philosophy of mind and neuroscience that have appeared to solve the mind/body problem by reducing the mind to a function or part of the brain tell us nothing about the phenomenological features of consciousness. He concludes that in order to understand consciousness, we must also study nonphysical forms of mental life such as motives, beliefs, and emotions to get a more complete understanding of conscious life. In the end, through detailed critiques of current philosophy of mind theories, Robinson succeeds in showing the complexity of consciousnesses and also presents a possible framework for advancing our understanding of the mind/body relationship. Highly recommended for academic libraries.
Editorials
PsycCRITIQUES -
Robinson offers up a feast... with sparkling prose, illuminating examples, and original analysis of the rich fare in each and every course.
PsycCRITIQUES
Robinson offers up a feast... with sparkling prose, illuminating examples, and original analysis of the rich fare in each and every course.— Barbara S. Held
Library Journal
In this short yet engaging book, Robinson (philosophy, Oxford Univ.) examines past and current theories on consciousness to see what we have accomplished in understanding the relationship between the mind and the body. He explains that, while the physical sciences have found answers to many of life's mysteries, a scientific framework may not be the correct model for understanding the mind/body relationship. According to Robinson, modern theories in philosophy of mind and neuroscience that have appeared to solve the mind/body problem by reducing the mind to a function or part of the brain tell us nothing about the phenomenological features of consciousness. He concludes that in order to understand consciousness, we must also study nonphysical forms of mental life such as motives, beliefs, and emotions to get a more complete understanding of conscious life. In the end, through detailed critiques of current philosophy of mind theories, Robinson succeeds in showing the complexity of consciousnesses and also presents a possible framework for advancing our understanding of the mind/body relationship. Highly recommended for academic libraries.
—Scott Duimstra