Mao: A Reinterpretation
Lee FeigonBooks.org participates in affiliate programs including Bookshop.org and the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.
Overview
"For many years now, historians and political observers have vilified Mao Zedong and placed him in a class with Hitler and Stalin as one of the twentieth century's most notorious tyrants. Mao's reputation first rose in the 1930s, when he was portrayed as a simple, uncorrupted populist hero. But with the triumph of communism in China after World War II, a disappointed Western public reinterpreted Mao as a godless Marxist. The real Mao, Lee Feigon suggests, was neither as smart and independent as earlier versions of him suggest, nor as evil as later interpretations have it." In this revisionist appraisal of Mao, Mr. Feigon, an accomplished Asian historian, argues that the leader has been tainted by the actions and policies of the Soviet-style bureaucrats he came to hate and attempted to eliminate. Mr. Feigon suggests that the movements for which Mao is almost universally condemned today - the Great Leap Forward and especially the Cultural Revolution - were in many ways beneficial for the Chinese people: they forced China to break with its Stalinist past and paved the way for its great economic and political strides in recent years. "Without discounting the horrific damage done," Mr. Feigon writes, "one cannot overlook the positive impact of these movements, which gave birth to the present China - indeed, they are more responsible for China's change in recent years than its trade with the West."Synopsis
Suggesting that some of Mao's most controversial policies were actually good for the Chinese people, Feigon (history, Colby College) offers a political biography of the leader of the Chinese Communist Revolution. He argues that Mao was much more willing to listen to non-communist individuals and even to place them in positions of moderate power than has previously been admitted. He contends that Mao's Cultural Revolution was an effort to reduce the power of Stalinist bureaucrats within his own party and suggest that it achieved its purpose of empowering peasants, women, and other marginalized people. In the end, argues Feigon, Mao's leadership set the stage for the future growth of the Chinese people. Annotation c. Book News, Inc.,Portland, OR
AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW
In a study bound to provoke controversy, Feigon makes his arguments lucidly...Readers will find his new summary... helpful.